EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME AGRICULTURAL WASTE IN THE TREATMENT OF PRODUCED WATER

  • Type: Project
  • Department: Petroleum Engineering
  • Project ID: PEE0055
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 136 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 251
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

This study investigated the concentration of heavy metals in oil field produced water

from Niger Delta, before and after treatment with locally sourced agricultural

wastes. Two produced water samples were investigated for different metal ions such

as; Lead, Nickel, Cadmium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Chromium, Zinc,

Manganese, Calcium, Arsenic, Boron, Tin and Barium. The produced water samples

were treated with four different adsorbents which are; Orange peels, Banana peels,

Palm Kernel Fiber and Luffa Cylindrica. These adsorbents were used at different

particle sizes of 63 and 150 microns. Ten of these metals were analyzed using the

atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) and the remaining four were analyzed

using the UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The analysis was carried out (in line with

the industrial standard) in order to determine the concentration of the metals in the

produced water samples.

The results obtained from the analysis showed that the concentration of the metal

ions investigated reduced drastically after treating. For example, the concentration

of lead, iron and zinc reduced from 0.095ppm, 0.045ppm, 0.108ppm to 0.018ppm,

0.001ppm and 0.002ppm respectively in sample X. The physical and chemical

properties as well as other contaminants of the produced water samples such as

chloride content, total dissolved solids and density were also determined before and

after treatment. There were reductions in the concentrations of these properties.

This showed that the produced water from the oil and gas activities should be treated

for metal ions present that may have concentrations higher than standard limits set

by regulatory bodies before disposal and/or re-use due to their negative effects to

man and its environment.

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.0: Petroleum hydrocarbon reservoir. ........................................................... 3
Figure 1.1. Steps involved in the dynamics of adsorption. ........................................ 9
Figure 3.0 Raw luffa cylindrica fiber and raw palm kernel fiber. ...........................24
Figure 3.1 Raw banana peels and raw orange peels. ...............................................25
Figure 3.2: Crushed and sieved banana peels. .........................................................26
Figure 3.3 Crushed and sieved orange peels............................................................26
Figure 3.4 Crushed and sieved palm kernel fiber. ...................................................27
Figure 3.5 Crushed and sieved luffa cylindrica. ......................................................27
Figure 3.6 Drying of the adsorbents in the oven after treatment with HNO3. ........28
Figure 3.7 Produced water samples and Adsorption process with the adsorbents. .28
Figure 3.8 Atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). .......................................30
Figure 3.9 UV-Visible spectrophotometer (spectrumlab 752s). ..............................35
Figure 3.10 Standard stock solutions for determining the concentration of arsenic,
boron, tin and barium in the samples. ......................................................................35
Figure 3.11 Filling the burette with the silver nitrate solution ................................37
Figure 3.12 Appearance of a reddish brown precipitate to determine the chloride
concentration. ...........................................................................................................38
Figure 3.13 Determination of the carbonates and biocarbonates concentration. ....40
Figure 3.14 Drying the evaporating dish filled with sample in the oven. ...............42
Figure 3.15 Sample of the filter paper with residue. ...............................................43
Figure 3.16 Taking the pH values from the pH meter. ............................................44
Figure 3.17 Pycnometer bottles used for density determination. ............................45
Figure 3.18 Electronic weighing balance. ...............................................................45
Figure 4.2.1 Calibration Curve of Absorbance vs Conc. Of Arsenic (mg/l). ..........55
Figure 4.2.2 Calibration Curve of Absorbance vs Conc. of Boron .........................57
Figure 4.2.3: Calibration Curve of Absorbance vs Conc. of Tin (mg/l)..................60
Figure 4.2.4 Calibration Curve of Absorbance vs Conc. of Barium (mg/l) ............62
Figure 4.4.1 Calibration Curve of Absorbance vs. Conc of Sulphate .....................66
viii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.0: Composition of oilfield produced water ................................................... 5
Table 1.1 Production Chemicals in oil and gas fields produced water...................... 6
Table 1.2. Oil adsorption capacities of different adsorbents ...................................11
Table 3.1 Flame-gas combination for metal ion analysis by AAS. .........................30
Table 4.1.1 Concentration of metals in the untreated sample X (Nembe Field). ....46
Table 4.1.2 Concentration of metals in the untreated sample Y (Colo Creek Field).
..................................................................................................................................47
Table 4.1.3 Concentration of metals in the treated sample X (using the adsorbents
individually). ............................................................................................................48
Table 4.1.4 Concentration of metals in the treated sample Y (using the adsorbents
individually). ............................................................................................................49
Table 4.1.5 Concentration of metals in the treated sample X (Concurrent mixture-
63 microns). .............................................................................................................50
Table 4.1.6 Concentration of metals in the treated sample X (Concurrent mixture-
150 microns). ...........................................................................................................51
Table 4.1.7 Concentration of metals in the treated sample Y (Concurrent mixture
63 microns). .............................................................................................................52
Table 4.1.8 Concentration of metals in the treated sample Y (Concurrent mixture-
150 microns). ...........................................................................................................53
Table 4.2.1 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer Absorbance Reading For Arsenic ...........54
Table 4.2.1.1 Concentration of Arsenic Ion in the Untreated Produced Water. ......55
Table 4.2.1.2 Concentration of Arsenic Ion in the Treated Samples. ......................56
Table 4.2.2 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer Absorbance Readings for Boron. ............57
Table 4.2.2.1 Concentration of Boron Ion in the Untreated Produced Water. ........58
Table 4.2.2.2 Concentration of Boron Ion in the Treated Samples. ........................58
Table 4.2.3 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer Absorbance Readings for Tin ..................59
Table 4.2.3.1 Concentration of Tin Ion in the Untreated Produced Water..............60
Table 4.2.3.2 Concentration of Tin Ion in the Treated Samples..............................61
Table 4.2.4 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer Absorbance Readings for Barium. ..........62
Table 4.2.4.1 Concentration of Barium Ion in the Untreated Produced Water. ......63
Table 4.2.4.2 Concentration of Barium Ion in the Treated Samples. ......................63
Table 4.3.1 Table Showing the Volume of Silver Nitrate Sample Used. ................64
Table 4.3.2 Chloride Concentration in the Untreated Produced Water. ..................65
Table 4.3.3 Chloride Concentration in the Treated Samples. ..................................65
Table 4.4.1 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer Absorbance Readings for Sulphate. ........66
ix
Table 4.4.2 Sulphate Concentration in the Untreated Produced Water. ..................67
Table 4.4.3 Sulphate Concentration in the Treated Samples. ..................................67
Table 4.5.1 Table Showing the Volume of Sulfuric Acid Used. .............................68
Table 4.5.2 Table Showing the Volume of Sulphuric Acid Used. ..........................69
Table 4.5.3 Concentration of Carbonates and Bicarbonates in the Untreated
Produced Water. .......................................................................................................69
Table 4.5.4 Concentration of Carbonates and Bicarbonates in the Treated Samples.
..................................................................................................................................70
Table 4.6.1 Table Showing the Amount of the Total Dissolved Solids in the
Untreated Samples. ..................................................................................................71
Table 4.6.2 Table Showing the Amount of the Total Suspended Solids in the
Treated Samples. ......................................................................................................71
Table 4.7.1 Table Showing the Amount of the Total Suspended Solids in the
Untreated Samples. ..................................................................................................72
Table 4.7.2 Table Showing the Amount of the Total Suspended Solids in the
Treated Samples. ......................................................................................................73
Table 4.8.1 Table Showing the pH Values of the Untreated Samples. ...................74
Table 4.8.2 Table Showing the pH Values of the Treated Samples. .......................74
Table 4.9.1 Table Showing the Density Values of the Untreated Produced Water
Samples. ...................................................................................................................75
Table 4.9.2 Table Showing the Density Values of the Treated Samples. ...............75
x
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION ........................................................................................................i
CERTIFICATION .................................................................................................... ii
DEDICATION ......................................................................................................... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................... v
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................ vii
LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................... x
CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................ 1
1.0Introduction ................................................................................................... 1
1.1Background of Study ..................................................................................... 1
1.2Origin of Produced Water ............................................................................. 2
1.3 Composition of Produced Water ................................................................ 4
1.4Effects of Produced Water ............................................................................ 6
1.5Treatment Technologies ................................................................................ 7
1.5.1Technologies for Removing Oil from Water ....................................... 7
1.5.2Technologies for Removing Salt from Water ...................................... 8
1.6Adsorption ..................................................................................................... 8
1.7Aims and Objectives of this Research Work ..............................................12
1.8Problem Statement ...................................................................................... 12
1.9Significance of Work .................................................................................. 12
1.10Expected Results ...................................................................................... 13
CHAPTER TWO ..................................................................................................... 14
2.0Literature Review ........................................................................................ 14
CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................................. 23
3.0Materials and Methodology ........................................................................ 23
3.1Experimental ............................................................................................... 23
3.2Materials and Equipment ............................................................................ 23
xi
3.2.1Materials ............................................................................................23
3.2.2Equipment .......................................................................................... 23
3.2.3Collection of Materials ...................................................................... 24
3.3Experimental Procedure ..............................................................................25
3.3.1Preparation of the Adsorbents (Banana Peels, Orange Peels, Luffa
Cylindrica and Palm Kernel Fiber) ..................................................................25
3.4Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) ....................................................29
3.4.1Procedure to Determine the Concentration of the Metal Ions Using
AAS ............................................................................................................31
3.4.2Reagents and Chemicals .................................................................... 31
3.5Laboratory Experiments to Determine the Concentration of the Metals in
the Samples Using UV-Vis Spectrophotometer ..................................................31
3.5.1Determination of Arsenic (As) Concentration ...................................31
3.5.2Determination of Boron (B) Concentration ....................................... 32
3.5.3Determination of Tin (Sn) Concentration .......................................... 33
3.5.4Determination of Barium (Ba) Concentration ................................... 34
3.6Laboratory Experiments to Determine Some Anions and Other Contents of
the Produced Water ..............................................................................................36
3.6.1Determination of the Chloride Concentration in the Produced Water
Samples ............................................................................................................36
3.6.2Determination of the Concentration of Carbonates and Bicarbonates in
the Produced Water Samples ...........................................................................38
3.6.3Determination of the Sulphate Concentration in the Produced Water
Samples ............................................................................................................40
3.6.4Determination of the Amount of Total Dissolved Solids Content in the
Produced Water Samples .................................................................................41
3.6.5Determination of the Amount of Total Suspended Solids in Produced
Water Samples .................................................................................................42
3.6.6Determination of the pH Value of the Produced Water Samples ...... 43
3.6.7Determination of the Density of the Produced Water Samples ......... 44
CHAPTER FOUR .................................................................................................... 46
xii
4.0Results and Discussion ................................................................................ 46
4.1Results ......................................................................................................... 46
4.1.1Concentration of Metals in Both the Untreated and Treated Samples
Using AAS .......................................................................................................46
4.2Concentration of Metal Ions in the Samples Using the UV-Vis
Spectrophotometer ...............................................................................................54
4.2.1Analysis of Arsenic (As) ....................................................................54
4.2.2Analysis of Boron (B) ........................................................................57
4.2.3Analysis of Tin (Sn) ........................................................................... 59
4.2.4Analysis of Barium (Ba) .................................................................... 62
4.3Results Showing the Chloride Content of both Treated and Untreated
Produced Water Sample .......................................................................................64
4.4Results Showing the Sulphate Concentration in both the Treated and
Untreated Produced Water Samples ....................................................................66
4.5Results Showing the Concentration of Carbonates and Bicarbonates in
both the Treated and Untreated Produced Water Samples ..................................68
4.6Results Showing the Total Dissolved Solids in both the Treated and
Untreated Produced Water Samples ....................................................................71
4.7Results Showing the Total Suspended Solids in both the Treated and
Untreated Produced Water Samples ....................................................................72
4.8Results showing the pH Values of both the Treated and Untreated
Produced Water Samples .....................................................................................73
4.9Results Showing the Density of both the Treated and Untreated
Produced Water Samples .....................................................................................74
4.10Discussion ................................................................................................ 76
CHAPTER FIVE ..................................................................................................... 77
5.0Conclusion and Recommendations ............................................................. 77
5.1Conclusion ................................................................................................... 77
5.2Recommendations ....................................................................................... 78
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 79
APPENDIX A .......................................................................................................... 84
xiii
APPENDIX B .......................................................................................................... 90
APPENDIX C .......................................................................................................... 95
APPENDIX D .......................................................................................................... 98
APPENDIX E ........................................................................................................ 103
APPENDIX F ......................................................................................................... 110
APPENDIX G ........................................................................................................ 115
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME AGRICULTURAL WASTE IN THE TREATMENT OF PRODUCED WATER
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: Petroleum Engineering
  • Project ID: PEE0055
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 136 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 251

500
Leave a comment...

    Related Works

    The study aimed at the design, construction and performance evaluation of a model domestic wastewater treatment plant was carried out. The treatment unit was a Waste Stabilization Pond (WSP) comprised of one facultative pond, three maturation ponds, and a contact filtration unit, all in series. The effluent of the WSP, after filtration through... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT Biological treatment of wastewater from Wupa Wastewater Treatment Plant, Abuja was investigated. Wastewater samples were collected from the inlet and effluent point (before and after the ultra violet radiation unit) of the treatment plant. The physicochemical parameters; temperature, pH, conductivity, total dissolved solids (TDS), total... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of company treatment on Biotoxicity of Tannery Waste Water in Northern Nigeria. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) was used to screen for effects on growth characteristics while onion (Allium cepa) was used to test for chromosomal aberrations after exposure to company treated and untreated Tannery... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT  The microbiological and organic pollutants characteristics of Owena dam in Ifedore local  government  area  of  Ondo-state,  Nigeria  was  carried  out,  nine  water  samples  were collected from three different parts of the downstream side, which include; around the waste disposal  site,  community  settlement  and ... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The microbiological and organic pollutants characteristics of Owena dam in Ifedore local government area of Ondo-state, Nigeria was carried out, nine water samples were collected from three different parts of the downstream side, which include; around the waste disposal site, community settlement and farm environment. The microorganisms... Continue Reading
    Water supply and Sewerage services in urban areas have in the past commonly been provided by monopolized Municipal Councils under the previous Local Government Ministry. As part of a general move by the sector to shift to market-led systems by restructuring the sector, a new paradigm emerged to transform water utilities into more modern service... Continue Reading
    water supply and sewerage services in urban areas have in the past commonly been provided by monopolized municipal councils under the previous local government ministry. as part of a general mov... Water Treatment And Purification Process: A Case... Continue Reading
    water supply and sewerage services in urban areas have in the past commonly been provided by monopolized municipal councils under the previous local government ministry. as part of a general mov... Water Treatment And Purification Process: A Case... Continue Reading
    Abstract The microbiological and organic pollutants characteristics of umuosoko stream in ikwuano local government area, Enugu state, Nigeria were carried out. Twenty water samples were collected from four different parts of the river.  The pour plate technique was employed for the isolation of micro-organisms. Colonial morphology, Gram staining... Continue Reading
    (A CASE STUDY OF EKULU RIVER, ENUGU) Abstract The microbiological and organic pollutants characteristics of umuosoko stream in ikwuano local government area, Enugu state, Nigeria were carried out. Twenty water samples were collected from four different... Continue Reading
    Call Us Get this work